Review of The Fifth Estate (2013) by Prosthetics — 17 Oct 2013
Had potential to be huge, but falls short. Still worth viewing though.
The start of the film is fast paced and very difficult to focus. There are metaphors/symbolism used quite a bit through the start of the movie (and through the end) that are not fully understood until about 1/3 or 1/2 through the movie (an office filled with Assanges, which represents how, when Wikileaks was making a name for itself, people thought it had hundreds of people working on it, but all of them were Assange himself with different aliases), which left me with a half-baked understanding of the point what was trying to be made. Once the film did finally start getting rolling, again about 1/3 or 1/2 through, it was great, but harkening back to that first part of the movie, it could be been done much better.
The movie also had great potential to send a message throughout, but the filmmakers chose to remain neutral as a whole, leaving the only person preaching the points to be Assange himself in the movie. So many messages could have been pushed through, but I suppose the need to remain neutral for mass appeal outweighed that. Only at the very end of the movie does a clear message come forth, when the Assange character is addressing you, the viewer, directly.
So my main qualms with the movie are that it was a train wreck to get the plot set up, and no clear message came with the movie.
This review of The Fifth Estate (2013) was written by Prosthetics on 17 Oct 2013.
The Fifth Estate has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
