Review of The Da Vinci Code (2006) by Michaell. — 21 May 2006
This was a fine, cerebral telling of an interesting story. Critics hate it, which signals "good film" to me. To a population raised on M:I:3 and Spiderman, yes, this is talky and slow in parts.
It actually, God forbid, requires some thought. If you go to this movie expecting explosions, unlikely romance, and non-stop impossible missions, you'll side with the critics. If you want a movie that is based in historic facts, plays with religious beliefs, and still manages to keep the educated viewer on the edge of his/her seat, you'll appreciate The DaVinci Code.
Most telling comment regarding the mental capacity of today's audiences...overheard leaving the theater: "Man, one mediocre car chase. Other than that, I was asleep..." 'Nuff said.
.. Ian McKellan has a field day,and should win an Oscar (but won't), Tom Hanks was good (though I'd have preferred George Clooney), and Audrey Tatou did a fine job. Ron Howard was faithful to the novel.
The cinematography, music and editing were top-notch. But, hey, it's no "Saw 2", so most viewers will find it boring.
This review of The Da Vinci Code (2006) was written by Michaell. on 21 May 2006.
The Da Vinci Code has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
