Review of The Case for Christ (2007) by Colin M — 23 Aug 2017

Well made, well played, to the extent of film making; yet the story feels quite biased and forced, based on blind faith for events that have never been proven real. And why is a reasonable man stigmatized by his wife for being skeptical (?) I believe that to be a legitimate question. The author puts inconvenient questions that cannot receive a definitive answer, simply cut it short, because it's convenient to the purpose of the story. He gets slapped on the wrist for doing so, and even punished by rejection from his wife. How convenient is that.

He just gives up disproving claims that have been around for way too long, he just surrenders to his wife blind faith. Maybe because he's afraid to lose everything in the name truth.

There are many inconsistencies in the scriptures that believers refuse to address, and so does this propaganda movie.

Messianic figures have appeared throughout history in several cultures, at different points in time. The life of Jesus is based on a collection of several accounts that are arbitrarily taken from different myths and cultures, such as Egyptian deity Horus and Roman Mithras, thousands of years older than Christianity. Key events such as the great flood originally was described in Sumerian tablets as caused by a superior species of giants that ruled the world and even created human species by DNA manipulation, to use them as slaves, according to those tablets, thousands of years older than Jesus. So what are we supposed to believe? Those are all valid accounts from ancient texts. Who holds the ultimate truth? No one has the definitive answer.