Review of The Avengers (2012) by Jt N — 08 Apr 2016
Marvel's 'The Avengers' is one of the most overrated films in the history of cinema. Preceded by the critically acclaimed 'Iron Man', the disappointing 'Iron Man 2', the acceptable 'Captain America: The First Avenger', the odd 'Thor', and the intense 'The Incredible Hulk'.
Loki is back in all of his 1980's hairstyle glory as the most overrated supervillain in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. I mean, honestly, what is so amazing about Tom Hiddleston's character? Mullet.
.. check. Creepy demeanor... check. Total pansy... check. English accent... check. Loki is literally laughable in the epic superhero roundup. The budget was clearly spent on the cast for the film rather than the actual film itself, and the storyline is hardly thought-provoking.
This film is socially acceptable because it was the first time "we had multiple major superheroes in one film and we pitted themselves against each other" which caused the comic ultra-fanboys to go stir-crazy.
Captain America looked so stinking ridiculous that he could have been a Power Ranger. After Iron Man takes the nuke into space, how does fall back through the wormhole? YOU CAN'T FALL IN SPACE! But my BIGGEST complaint was Bruce Banner's line: "I'm always angry.
" Angry = Hulk... hello? The entire equation for the presence of the Hulk monstrosity is now entirely in question, people! That literally make zero sense. Okay, my rant is over. Despite it's flaws, it was a fun movie.
If you overlook it's major defects, as most people have, it can exciting to see.
This review of The Avengers (2012) was written by Jt N on 08 Apr 2016.
The Avengers has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
