Review of The Alamo (2004) by Scott F — 23 Jan 2009

This movie for historians is much better becuse there was much more research done for this film than the John Wayne version of the 1960s. It's much more acuate. The action is better. You get a diffrent point of view than the other films on the Alamo on Davy Crockett charatr & what kind of man he was.

Also you see muh more of General Sam Houston's role before & after the Alamo. More than you see in the other Alamo films. The graphics are great & you get a lot more historical facts other than the battle of the Alamo in this film than others becuse you get the back story of before the alamo to the battle after the Alamo.

Also you get a better idea of what kind of man Santa Anna was than past films made.