What we have here is a model for the paint-by-numbers, perfectly generic, proudly soulless summer action flick. An original idea would die for lack of oxygen in S.W.A.T.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of S.W.A.T. (2003) was written by Peter Travers and published by Rolling Stone on 31 Mar 2017.
S.W.A.T. has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Michael Atkinson (678) for Village Voice (8,525) on 27 Jan 2018
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Kevin Carr (1,610) for Film Threat (5,156) on 23 Apr 2016
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Lee M (4,001) on 04 Feb 2018
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Kenneth Turan (2,323) for Los Angeles Times (12,977) on 03 Mar 2014
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Ryan C (2,517) on 31 Aug 2013
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By David J (1,942) on 22 Dec 2014
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Jake H (374) on 10 Jan 2016
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
Review of Johnny English (2003)
Review of Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)
By David Edelstein (2,124) for Slate (2,081) on 15 Apr 2008
Review of Blade Runner (1982)
Review of True Romance (1993)
Review of Beverly Hills Cop III (1994)
By Caryn James (352) for The New York Times (9,847) on 02 Sep 1996
Review of The Million Dollar Hotel (2000)
By Ellen Mackay (18) for Common Sense Media (4,943) on 01 Jan 2011
Popular Movies Right Now
