While the movie is stupid, it is -- hooray, and let's put this in all the national ads! -- not appallingly stupid.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of S.W.A.T. (2003) was written by Stephen Hunter and published by Washington Post on 17 Apr 2008.
S.W.A.T. has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Andrew K (2,033) on 28 Mar 2014
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Ryan C (2,517) on 31 Aug 2013
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By J.r. Jones (1,066) for Chicago Reader (7,190) on 30 May 2014
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
By Natalie G (416) on 11 Oct 2013
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
Review of S.W.A.T. (2003)
Review of Tango & Cash (1989)
By Variety Staff (1,156) for Variety (12,700) on 05 May 2008
Review of Barton Fink (1991)
By Jake Euker (172) for F5 (Wichita, KS) (139) on 09 Feb 2006
Review of National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1 (1993)
By Rita Kempley (781) for Washington Post (9,851) on 01 Jan 2000
Review of The Black Dahlia (2006)
By Elliej. (1) on 16 Sep 2006
Review of The Fast and the Furious (2001)
By Wise_Guy (2) on 01 Jul 2012
Review of The Italian Job (2003)
By Tylyndah (88) on 02 May 2020
Popular Movies Right Now
