Review of Superman III (1983) by Kyle20Ellis — 14 Apr 2020
PROS: The cinematography is beautiful, and the special effects are above average. The score is still rousing, and Christopher Reeve is likable enough as Superman. The film is decently paced and there are one or neat touches such as when Superman turns nasty.
CONS: The storytelling is very clunky for me, while the script is awful. Margot Kidder apparently wanted little to do with this film and if true I'm afraid it does show, while Robert Vaughan is a pretty poor replacement for Gene Hackman and the less said about Pamela Stephenson the better. Also the direction is rather heartless and using Richard Pryor as the source of the laughs just didn't work.
Overall, it is disappointing and lacklustre but it is watchable unlike the fourth. Anyway that is another story.
This review of Superman III (1983) was written by Kyle20Ellis on 14 Apr 2020.
Superman III has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
