Review of Stoker (2013) by Richard Corliss for TIME Magazine — 01 Mar 2013
The movie is less to be experienced than to be appreciatively studied, like an insect, a stuffed bird, or the sketch by a gifted artist in the style of an Old Master — in this case, the Master of Suspense.
It’s not pure Park or pure Hitchcock but a muted, mildly mesmerizing blend of the two. You might want to take a careful stroll in this Hitchpark.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Stoker (2013) was written by Richard Corliss and published by TIME Magazine on 01 Mar 2013.
Stoker has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
