Review of Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) by Anthony Lane for New Yorker — 15 May 2005
The general opinion of Revenge of the Sith seems to be that it marks a distinct improvement on the last two episodes, "The Phantom Menace" and "Attack of the Clones." True, but only in the same way that dying from natural causes is preferable to crucifixion.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) was written by Anthony Lane and published by New Yorker on 15 May 2005.
Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
