Review of Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) by Brandon M — 13 Mar 2016
I really don't at all find this better than "The Phantom Menace". Even though I had issues with "The Phantom Menace" for some big reasons, based on my opinion, I find this one to be the least of the Star Wars series.
The first thing that the movie suffers is how it gives out so many expositions. I don't believe that the film does an excellent job explaining the plot or the situations that's happening in the film, so that was a problem. But that's not my real problem. My real problem is the relationship between Anakin and Padme. I don't think it's sweet nor effective. I just think it's tedious and uninteresting. I don't find Hayden Christensen's performance as wooden as Jake Lloyd's performance in "The Phantom Menace", but he is close.
The film does deliver nice special effects and a lot of effort, so I'll give points for that. It's fine that people will say that this is better than "The Phantom Menace", but for me, I dislike this one a little more than "The Phantom Menace". 4.5/10.
This review of Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) was written by Brandon M on 13 Mar 2016.
Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
