Review of Spider-Man 3 (2007) by Jamie I — 26 Jun 2016

Three flicks and still no proposal?  I guess since the flicks are based on the Ultimate series we shouldn't see that yet?  I don't know I don't read Spider-Man.  Maybe those of you who do could tell me.

..does Venom switch from Venom face to Brock face like in the film?  Or was that because of budgetary reasons?  Because that was LAME.  It really detracted from the awesomeness that is Venom.  And another complaint boy he took a really freaking long time to show up and when he did his scenes were very few.

 Dammit they always short the best character.  Fuckers.  Also, I now get why some people called Pete "Emo Peter Parker" and yeah I didn't care for that ridiculousness.  Also, for Venom being as bad ass as he was he sure got a weak fucking death.

 Pipes.  WEAK!  Fuckers. Some things I liked were for one Gwen Stacy.  She looked exactly I mean exactly like her comic counterpart.  Hey, Stan Lee makes a cameo!  There must be a clause for signing over rights to his books.

 Speaking of cameos Bruce Campbell takes the fucking cake for his French maître de who pronounces "Parker" like "Pecker."  Priceless.  Good idea killing Harry Osborn.  It pained me to look at the beautiful James Franco with a scarred face.

 James Franco...drool.  I really enjoyed Sandman.  The initial transformation was cool because I'm assuming that if you receive weird powers you wouldn't know immediately how to control them.

 The special effects with Sandman were well done in my opinion.  I enjoyed the newspaper on the wall at the Bugle about Doc Ock still at large. Some good.  Some bad.  I think at this point if you've made it this far through the series you just have to continue to plow through.

 After all I know I'd like to see how this all turns out.