Review of Slumdog Millionaire (2008) by Arjun N — 27 Dec 2012
After winning eight Oscars I was all set to experience a masterpiece. I dunno, but I didn't get it. Do I need to watch it again? Is this a new genre? What am I missing? I did not enjoy the cinema theater experience - as I rented it and watched it in HD. That might've contributed to my lack of understanding or sensory deprivation.
Hence, I saw what seemed like a "young love" story set against the sometimes horrid background of Mumbai, India. The slums and all that goes with it. The flashback sequences with the young children, then as young teens is compelling. Then suddenly we're thrust into the future rooting for the still young Jamal Malik the contestant on India's version of "Who wants to be a millionaire." All of the questions somehow reflect and ignite memories of his street urchin childhood. This is not an innovative concept. We can all guess the ending.
I grant you - the photography is beautiful and I guess the kudos for sound, editing, etc., that the academy bestowed are probably deserved. Dev Patel as the older Jamal seems out of sync. He's just too pretty and does not fit the part.
Well... One of the best movies... ever made? Nope! Not even the best of 2008. Good, compelling, interesting and no more.
Slum-dog millionaire is not a great film, slum-dog millionaire is not a good film. it's an OK film.
This review of Slumdog Millionaire (2008) was written by Arjun N on 27 Dec 2012.
Slumdog Millionaire has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
