Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 12 Jun 2026 at 02:30 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Leif S — 25 Sep 2007

Share
Tweet

Often, a director makes a film, realizes at some point that it was not his best effort, then claims (justly or not) that studio pressures altered his intended "vision." Such is the case with Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, which is far from the masterpiece many Peckinpah apologists assert.

First off, Coburn's perfomance alone make this one worth watching. If you like Dylan's music, then go buy the soundtrack rather than sit through two hours of Kris Kristofferson - a pudgy-faced 20-year-old with the gruff voice of a 80-year-old lifelong smoker (its annoying).

Unfocused editing, clunky acting (esp. on the part of Charles Martin Smith), and the distraction of casting Bob Dylan in a speaking role all work against the film. Some scenes are inexcuseably bad. For instance, Garrett looks over a shirtless Kid after blowing him away, and viewers realize there is no blood - none.

It was later revealed that Peckinpah forgot the blood but shot the scene anyhow. Typical of a somewhat careless film that had the potential of a classic.

This review of Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid (1973) was written by on 25 Sep 2007.

Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid has generally received positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS