Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 05 Jun 2026 at 15:48 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Ken S — 21 Nov 2012

Share
Tweet

The script is good, and the action is very well directed...this could've worked, but Telly Savalas is boring as Blofield, not as good as Pleasance, and George Lazenby is about as weak as someone stepping into big shoes could be.

Had Roger Moore taken over now, or Connery returned, this might have been better (or hell...if they had even been able to convince the 22 year old Timothy Dalton to take over the role!). Lazenby is just not as strong an actor as Connery or some of the other actors who have taken on the role.

The film, which has a well written script and a good basic storyline, suffers because of it. He may look the part, but he is stiff and delivers lines poorly. Trying to convince the audience that he is still the same man as Connery with little references to the previous films feels forced, and it only serves to remind us all that this is no Connery.

Even today, in which audiences are used to different actors in the Bond role, it still feels as if this major element is just missing. Shame, because it has one of the best character arcs for Bond in the script.

This review of On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969) was written by on 21 Nov 2012.

On Her Majesty's Secret Service has generally received positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of On Her Majesty's Secret Service

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS