Review of Mission: Impossible III (2006) by Jimb. — 14 May 2006
I'm confused; I see people calling this movie "enjoyable" and "entertaining" , yet "not nessarily a good movie." What kind lunacy is this? This is just your stereotypical critic: a guy who nit-picks just because he can.
What happened to a movie being judged on it's entertainment value? Kind of common sense, right? I tend to use that a alot, I'm just non-intellectual like that. I mean... makes sense to me, a movie entertains me.
.. it probably deserves a higher score. These are the same guys, who rate snorefests a 10 because of great acting and dialogue. That's all well and good, and it certainly helps a movie, but if it's still not that entertaining, is that "nesessarily a good movie?" I'll let you ponder that question.
Meanwhile, go see this movie.
This review of Mission: Impossible III (2006) was written by Jimb. on 14 May 2006.
Mission: Impossible III has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
