Review of Mary Magdalene (2018) by Ian W — 15 Dec 2018
Mindless rubbish that is so inaccutate, when they had the chance to do a proper job. First the Date 33CE CHRIST was put to death at NISAN 14 33CE so the time line is wrong.And God's law required Cleanness with short hair as His word says long hair on a man is a disgrace, and the LANK SCRUFFY AND DIRTY PRESENTATION OF JESUS WAS BAD.
Now to PETER and ANDREW, there is no way that these two apostles were BLACK AFRICAN as they were Gallilean Jews.The idea that Mary ever bore a child by Christ is just anotther worthless tradition with no fact and the proof (As God's Son he knew he was to die, so he would not have left an unmarried pregnant woman behind after his death as immorality on Mary's part would have meant her being stoned to death) .
Artistic accuracy is not hard if time is taken to achieve, if you rely on Bible Truth without artistic license .It could have been a good film but isn't.
This review of Mary Magdalene (2018) was written by Ian W on 15 Dec 2018.
Mary Magdalene has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
