Review of Luther (2003) by Stephen Holden for The New York Times — 25 Apr 2004
As the film veers uncertainly between meticulous historical recapitulation and shameless hokum, it brings enough characters to populate a mini-series. When the historical details become too clogged, the movie shamelessly overcompensates by wallowing in cheap sentimentality.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Luther (2003) was written by Stephen Holden and published by The New York Times on 25 Apr 2004.
Luther has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
