Review of London Has Fallen (2016) by 3Ebfan511 — 31 Aug 2017
Beyond bad. The first one was pretty bad but had a few decent lines and was vaguely entertaining for the premise. (maybe a 5/10.) This movie takes anything that was good in the first one...and throws it in a dumpster, lights it on fire, and adds a bunch of racism, stereotyping, and poor dialogue on top of it.
There are maybe a few cool action scenes but it was so bad I honestly forgot what happened...or even if I had seen it at all...until I see it was on Netflix...I fastforwarded though it in seconds...and noticed that yes, that was one of the worst movies I had the misfortune of watching.
So predictable and banal...that I had forgotten most of the actual film or fast-forwarded though half of it it was so bad. If you like not just dumb action movies, but very dumb action movies, you might think this movie is OK.
Suggestion: be ready to fast forward after the early explosions happen because the 2nd half of the movie...just gets worse from there. At least write in an interesting bad guy or something that hasn't been done 50,000,000 million times before and the movie might have actually been remembered for something.
Terrible waste of a decent premise and decent actors: 2/10.
This review of London Has Fallen (2016) was written by 3Ebfan511 on 31 Aug 2017.
London Has Fallen has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
