Review of Lawrence of Arabia (1962) by Jj M — 30 Sep 2012
An almost marvelous film to me but it just doesn't stand out as one of the greatest of all time. Granted, David Lean had a magnificent eye for epic film-making. In fact he probably single-handedly defined the genre.
His films from the 50s and 60s with their biblical, grand scope are those which stand out amongst others of similar ilk. I will always remember Lawrence more than I will Spartacus or Ben Hur for example.
Having said that, Lawrence of Arabia is a superficially historical account of the man's own egotistical ramblings. I was never able to shake that off. It seems very biblical, which can be confusing when you consider it's the 20th Century.
It's the Middle East sure (and my, is it not a spectacular setting?) but it's very much a British colonial expression of what the Middle East was during world war I. Lawrence was very much of that mindset but one has to say on reflection, Lean was also, i.
E. patronising towards other's cultures. Also, the film's constant proper and staged dialogue can feel disconcerting after over 2 hours of viewing, particularly when things get violent. Alec Guinness is unintentionally comical as Prince Feisal while the enigmatic and severely compelling performance by Peter O'Toole is, dare I say, overacted.
He provides a character which is the stuff of legends, don't get me worng, but his personal presence falls short of brilliant. Pretty much like the film.
This review of Lawrence of Arabia (1962) was written by Jj M on 30 Sep 2012.
Lawrence of Arabia has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
