Review of King Kong (2012) by Kristy A — 25 May 2013

Unlike the 1976 version, the 2005 King Kong is right on par with the 1933 film. Peter Jackson makes a very long, but superb version of a classic. The story is faithful to the '33 film, but manages to take new directions that are very good.

The acting here is much better and the characters are much more enjoyable. The writing and direction is good, but still has some of Jacksons flawed moments, but manage not to detract from the film. The 2005 King Kong is at par with the '33 and even a tad bit better; the emotions and storylines here are very well done by everyone involved and make this a truly great film.