Review of King Kong (1933) by Daniel V — 09 Mar 2017
Sure some of the acting is wooden and corny but Armstrong as Denham is perfect! Plus this is 1933 for crying out loud. And the only thing that matters here is Kong anyway. Kong is still magic to watch in all his Stop Motion glory.
1933 people, and this is 2017. Still holds up as a rollicking adventure with a few scares.
This review of King Kong (1933) was written by Daniel V on 09 Mar 2017.
King Kong has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
