Review of King Arthur (2004) by Spadenx — 02 Jan 2012
It was ok but (and some huge buts) there is a lot of terrible acting through out the film. Clive Owen wasnt that good of a lead (which was rather suprising because I tend to like Clive Owen's films). The action sequences were too generic and slow placed. The script was terrible as well. Also it pretty much butchered the entire story of King Arthur.
Suprisingly though it was still a somewhat likeable film for some unknown reason.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by Spadenx on 02 Jan 2012.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
