Review of King Arthur (2004) by [Anonymous] — 24 Dec 2005
Despite some good battle scenes, King Arthur is ultimately a dull dissapointment. It doesn't really follow through on anything it presents, and none of the ideals were clear cut. Thus, there is little, if any, resonance, and when even the best battle are rolling, you don't care much.
Kingdom of heaven, Gladiator, LOTR and even the underrated Troy are more clear cut, refined epics that do much better jobs.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by [Anonymous] on 24 Dec 2005.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
