Review of King Arthur (2004) by Roger Ebert for Chicago Sun-Times — 05 Oct 2016
Not a bad movie, although it could have been better. It isn't flat-out silly like "Troy," its actors look at home as their characters, and director Antoine Fuqua curtails the use of computer effects in the battle scenes, which involve mostly real people.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by Roger Ebert and published by Chicago Sun-Times on 05 Oct 2016.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
