Review of King Arthur (2004) by Phil M — 25 Mar 2009
It got panned by the critics but it was good.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by Phil M on 25 Mar 2009.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
It got panned by the critics but it was good.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by Phil M on 25 Mar 2009.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 05 Oct 2016
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Brendan N (1,490) on 13 Mar 2016
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Kirk Honeycutt (1,481) for The Hollywood Reporter (7,050) on 06 Aug 2015
Review of Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975)
Review of The Passion of the Christ (2004)
By Jake Euker (172) for F5 (Wichita, KS) (139) on 08 Mar 2004
Review of Independence Day (1996)
By Nigelm. (8) on 09 Jun 2008
Review of Seven Samurai (1954)
Popular Movies Right Now