Review of King Arthur (2004) by David S — 07 Apr 2009
Marks to Clive Owen. He's a great actor and did what he could with a rather poor character base. The story itself is just a little shallow, but it is by no means horrific. Not sure why Knightley was cast in this part, considering the terrible faces the rest of her people have.
In itself, its useless as a piece of history, but entertaining nonetheless. Compared to Alexander, at least we won't get bored and have something enjoyable to spend our time doing.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by David S on 07 Apr 2009.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
