Review of King Arthur (2004) by William M — 08 Apr 2009
What a novel idea, but so dumbly portrayed. I kept asking myself why, in the battle scenes, everyone rushed into combat instead of standing back, shooting arrows, and, uh... winning. It's supposed to be a "realistic" take on Arthurian myth, but in the end is probably just as silly and fake as any other fictional representation.
And it's a generic action movie with bland, archetypical characters to boot. At least it's marginally good looking, when it's not muddy and grimy as heck.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by William M on 08 Apr 2009.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
