In this version of the classic tale, Arthur's nights came across less than nobal in most instances. In fact Lancelot was a bit of a loser. Otherwise I think the movie was pretty decent. Not in the same class as Braveheart, but worth your while to watch.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by Martin N on 14 Aug 2009.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Mark Steyn (90) for The Spectator (1,162) on 24 Jan 2018
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Michael Wilmington (1,474) for Chicago Tribune (6,211) on 17 Dec 2015
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 05 Oct 2016
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Marc Savlov (2,019) for Austin Chronicle (7,653) on 23 May 2016
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of The Passion of the Christ (2004)
By Jake Euker (172) for F5 (Wichita, KS) (139) on 08 Mar 2004
Review of Independence Day (1996)
By Nigelm. (8) on 09 Jun 2008
Review of The Man Who Would Be King (1975)
By Geno E (13) on 05 Mar 2013
Review of Seven Samurai (1954)
Popular Movies Right Now
