Review of King Arthur (2004) by James C — 04 Jan 2010
Re-telling of the Arthurian Legend that manages to miss most of the majesty and splendour of, say, "Excalibur" (or even BBCs "Merlin") by doing away with nearly all of the elements that has helped the legend to live through the ages: no Excalibur, no magic, no Quest for the Holy Grail, no love triangle ...
(and the miscasting doesn't help, either).
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by James C on 04 Jan 2010.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
