While King Arthur isn't a waste of time, per se, the story hasn't exactly been reinvented in a way that makes its two hours compelling viewing.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of King Arthur (2004) was written by Glenn Whipp and published by Los Angeles Daily News on 05 Jul 2004.
King Arthur has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Mark Steyn (90) for The Spectator (1,162) on 24 Jan 2018
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Marc Savlov (2,019) for Austin Chronicle (7,653) on 23 May 2016
Review of King Arthur (2004)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 05 Oct 2016
Review of Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975)
Review of Independence Day (1996)
By Nigelm. (8) on 09 Jun 2008
Review of Ben-Hur (1959)
By Logan M (1,902) on 21 Feb 2018
Popular Movies Right Now
