Review of Kangaroo Jack (2003) by Richard T — 30 Aug 2007
I know what you're saying. How could you rate this horrible, fuckin, piece of kangaroo shit? What are you gonna tell us, it's fun, like all the other movies you've reviewd? Well, not to bust anyone's ass or anything like that, but largely what you're saying is accurate.
But, like you so eloquently put it, I'll review any movie that amuses me, even if it's the shittiest. I remember when this first came out in theatres. I was more lucky then I thought for not seeing it in theatres only to realize I made the right choice to wait for it on DVD.
I quickly bought it, and soon regretted it for being such a freakin retard. Right away what pissed me off is the fuckin kangaroo doesn't even talk. Honestly, how many people got led to believe he talked during the movie? Jerry "Fuckheimer" in this case, gladly led us to a rude awakening.
He talked in a fuckin dream...o so that was supposed to be the "realistic" part of the movie. Everything else was bullshit. Exucuse me for my "honorary" lewd and figurative (I dont know u decide if it is) language, but I'm sure others did a better job at "busting the balls of this movie".
Though I sound like I wanna wreck this movie, I'm gonna be "painfully" earnest and veracious, but I laughed at how idiotic and cheesy it was, to the point where I kinda enjoyed it. The scene where the kangaroo dances, the moment when he steals the money, and Christopher Walken is the reason this movie gets a three.
Other then that, I'd rather have diarrhea. Don't take it seriously, cuz if you do you'll be more then dissapointed; you'll be insulted. Not highly recommendable for kids, but they may have a "hoppin" good time watching Jackie Legs posses more brains than any character in the movie.
This review of Kangaroo Jack (2003) was written by Richard T on 30 Aug 2007.
Kangaroo Jack has generally received negative reviews.
Was this review helpful?
