Review of Julius Caesar (1953) by Brian M — 29 Aug 2007
It wasn't very compelling as a film in general. It's hard to feel sympathetic for Roman conspirators, and their power-grabs--though honorable men they were. But the direction and acting was good.
Marlon Brando's parts as Marc Antony, (the soliloquy, the Speech) carries this entire film. A one of a kind performance, that Brando made truly genuine. Any other emulation of his interpretation would just be a mere affection.
(I had to repeat it on the DVD because I wasn't expecting him to take it upon himself to do it that well.) Other than that, it was a little boring to be honest. James Mason played Brutus as somewhat tentative, somewhat conflicted.
And of course there were many fine lines (It's Shakespeare of course), well orated (many by Brando) "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him." "This was a man" , and the focus on Brutus wasn't in vain upon the conclusion.
Solid adaptation, but probably of more interest to those who care for the craft--and those who want to see Brando take on Shakespeare. Note: One part, I liked, that might just be me, was when Cassius and Brutus are bickering, as men in power.
The Roman crowd in the film, that turns into a mob, vaguely reminded me of Springfield...Vaguely.
This review of Julius Caesar (1953) was written by Brian M on 29 Aug 2007.
Julius Caesar has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
