Review of Heckler (2007) by Arlo L — 17 Nov 2012

As far as their "message", they didn't realize what it entailed. There are performers that just do their thing and caring about what other people think just isn't applicable, Patton Oswalt being one of these people, who was in this film, but he didn't really apply himself to a particular side of the argument because he knew that it's stupid to go as far as Kennedy did. Kennedy is famous because he is good at appealing to the stupid crowd, but he wants to take it to a universal thought, which is a very bad idea, and if he didn't have those kinds of ideas, NOBODY would have a reasonable right to complain as hastily as some do, that's all that he needs to do!

Sort of like an argument between an Atheist and a Christian. Each are too much into their own trench to change any opinion they have. Though, Christian's believe in God for a comfort in everything and Atheists don't have a comfort, but rather knowledge, and they apply this knowledge to things, and their knowledge can extend far beyond a Christian. I compare Christians to the "bad performers" such as Jamie Kennedy, and critics to Atheists. There are some performers in here that I like, primarily because they're harmless and I just like what they do, and they don't drive this film, though. It's the untalented ones who do, and they provide a pointless argument, with support that they have comfort in their lives, rather than the critics, which isn't a good one. Though I found the "message" pointless, I did enjoy the movie. It was pure fun for the first part, but then it turned into something that tried to say something. I disagreed and agreed with a lot, it was simply fun to have my brain working in that way. I am a fucking funny person, but I COMPLETELY separate my funny and my "logicalities, but some people do intertwine them, which is okay to a certain extent, and that where this film rivals itself. I don't like to be hasty in criticizing things, or even reviewing things I don't like, but films like this one bring it upon itself.