Review of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) by Jimmytancredi — 28 May 2011
Chris Columbus has pledged to make adjustments faithful to the books, and succeeded. Reading the book makes us see the movie the way it is. But adaptation of the second was very long, less than the first child, and to me that climate was not "magic" and the incredible first.
It is very good, very faithful to the book, shows the beginning of the ripening of the series (even very lightly). When you take the second and sixth films, see how the saga changed the face. And he feels a twinge of nostalgia.
However, is by far the weakest of the series. And the problem is the same as in Stone, the script, that's so true to the book it becomes extremely tedious as the movie. And what makes it weaker than the first is that the magic in this direction from Columbus disappears almost completely.
The film continues with good performances and great junior adults. Again a beautiful soundtrack Williams, and the effects a little better over the first.
This review of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) was written by Jimmytancredi on 28 May 2011.
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
