I found it more pleasurable as a time waster than either "Mission: Impossible.".
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000) was written by Lou Lumenick and published by New York Post on 08 Jan 2002.
Gone in Sixty Seconds has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000)
By Stephen Hunter (927) for Washington Post (9,851) on 19 Sep 2013
Review of Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000)
By David Sterritt (1,643) for Christian Science Monitor (3,788) on 06 Feb 2013
Review of Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000)
By Michael Wilmington (1,474) for Chicago Tribune (6,211) on 20 Jul 2009
Review of Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000)
By Dennis Lim (218) for Village Voice (8,525) on 19 Apr 2004
Review of Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000)
Review of Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000)
By Hazel-Dawn Dumpert (105) for L.A. Weekly (3,142) on 14 May 2014
Review of Rope (1948)
By Steve H (1,232) on 13 Feb 2012
Review of Get Carter (1971)
By Deadly V (456) on 04 Jan 2012
Review of Die Hard 2 (1990)
By Scott Weinberg (1,998) for eFilmCritic.com (5,125) on 24 Jul 2002
Review of Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985)
By Dylan K (291) on 25 Nov 2017
Review of Cape Fear (1991)
Popular Movies Right Now
