Review of For Love or Money (1993) by Richard Harrington for Washington Post — 13 Dec 1996
The major problem with "For Love or Money" is its leads, since Fox is no Cary Grant and Anwar no Audrey Hepburn. Fox is sweetly engaging at times but he still seems too boyish to be convincing.
And though he wheels and deals with flair, no romantic sparks fly between him and Anwar. Of course, as she proved with Al Pacino in "Scent of a Woman," it takes two to tango -- and Anwar simply is too vapid an actress, a poor woman's Adrienne Shelly with a flat voice, wan looks and all too little presence.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of For Love or Money (1993) was written by Richard Harrington and published by Washington Post on 13 Dec 1996.
For Love or Money has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
