Review of Fifty Shades Darker (2017) by Norm D — 02 Jul 2017
Pretty lame. But then this is female soft porn conceived by a husky heavyweight who'd probably settle for any attention - or maybe her hub-bub showed her some jiggle balls. Graphic nudity? Even the unrated version isn't graphic, nary a muff in view.
The dialogue is especially lame, trite, clichéd. And it's written by the book author's hub-bub. So who dares say "This is bad. Bring in the re'writers." And in places the screen activity is just embarrassing - for the male viewers watching a clutz (with cash) and a pretty, shapely, willing girl - & for the actors performing on camera.
But, as the Credits teaser vignette shows, it's still going to end with the marriage fairy tale, the woman having saved the man who was head-screwed from birth by mothers & other women. Yet even the rich bad boys most often turn out to be .
.. Donald J. Trump ... (mean men). This dood admitted he's a sado. Foreshadowed, forewarned.
This review of Fifty Shades Darker (2017) was written by Norm D on 02 Jul 2017.
Fifty Shades Darker has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
