Review of Fear of the Dark (2003) by Melanie D — 17 Aug 2011
So,while browsing the shelves at future shop looking for something new to watch, I stumble across this movie. Having never heard of it previously, I figure, what the hell, I'll give it a shot. It's looks interesting.
Obviously low budget, but that's not always a bad thing. The movie takes place largely in one location; within the house. The actors playing the 2 brothers do a decent job, not ging over the top, and portraying the characters believably, evenif their acting is a little uneven.
Far better than other comparable films. The atmosphere created by playing with light and shadows and the use f sound effects is what makes this movie an effective thriller. It isn't downright terrifying, but does have some creepy moments.
The visual effects show the lowbudget nature of the film, but are buyable and the monsters are not overused or clearly visible for long portions of time which helps to make them effective. The story is interesting and relatable to most people who remember what it was like to be scared of what was lurking it the dark as a child.
The story explores those monsters being actually real, rather than just existing in the overactive mind of a child. The pacing is good for the film, it never really gets bogged down at any point, but does have a few points where there long spaces between scares.
At least it never really lets up with the creepy atmosphere. Not a movie that will redefine the genre, but a competant entry from a filmaker and cast that have a lot of potential. Worth a look if you're after something that isn't regular studio fare.
And if you'd like to relive your childhood fear of the dark.
This review of Fear of the Dark (2003) was written by Melanie D on 17 Aug 2011.
Fear of the Dark has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
