Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 07 Jun 2026 at 10:04 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Anonymous User — 06 Nov 2011

Share
Tweet

My opinion will be refuted by all the world's intellects lol. It is a worthless piece of shit that amounts to propaganda for the terrorist who magically shows up in the news again just as this movie is released on criterion.

By refusing the bourgeoise affect of dramatic filmmaking with suspense and psychological insight (it just has lots of empty blather, shaky cam violence, and hipster-bait nihilist sex scenes), the director pretends significance in portraying cold 'facts' about a psychopath funded and supported by the left wing states of the communist block in applying terror to make change on the world grid.

By refusing insight or as Assayas says "moralizing," the movie is left with bad actors pretending to be bland cause freaks who just want to blow shit up but have grand 'revolutionary' justifications.

The movie might have something to say if it intended to show how banal the face and actions of terrorism really are but it also wants to show how History is made by these acts, yet refuses to investigate how and why- in other words it's stuck at the level of Newsweek clippings in depicting official events, not digging deeper in to behind the scenes forces.

So it is the usual belief in a random universe ideology of the wannabe intelligentsia, covertly and maybe unknowingly creating PR for the things it is portraying. "History as it really is." But we can know how and why up to a point, but that would mean uncovering the lies of the left wing, which the filmmakers most likely do not want to do.

Instead they let the Carlos character's blather about imperialists stand unchallenged just as he says the same schtick in real life on Reuters in 2011. One can envisage a way of dramatically examining the lies and contradictions of left and right- Spielberg's Munich did that brilliantly.

Refusing to look at motives and human choices for negativity and relying on the social dynamic and 'history choosing itself' all sounds like Marxist bullshit to me. Whenever a work claims to be apolitical it rarely is.

For a better film about similar topics see The Baader Meinhoff Complex or Munich.

This review of Carlos (2010) was written by on 06 Nov 2011.

Carlos has generally received very positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of Carlos

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS