Review of Brokeback Mountain (2005) by Mark J — 22 Jul 2016
This movie was great more for characterization and choice in characters rather than plot. It is slow but the detailed scenes (like art to an artist) and crafted raw passion between two men make it up. I see GBLT movies, and the directors usually find (on purpose or not) a male stereotypical looking "feminine" woman.
To balance the other person who is stereotypically male. I guess to save face that there should be male and female roles even in homosexual relationships. In Brokeback Mountain, I did not see this at all. These men did not have anything that I would say is bias as with other homosexual oriented media. The only thing that was a little off was the "moon in the sky" and references to sin. Though that is so little compared to the characters and their acting.
This is a movie more for the art than anything else. A film lover or one that has a passion for film making through the artist eyes would find appreciation in this movie. Others not so much since it doesn't build up to the plot to lighten the effect of the first erotic scene. That, and I think the erotic scene may put a raw impression on the future intimacy scenes.
Again, characterization, art, and attention to detail was perfect.
I recommend it for anyone who can see passed media's perspective on homosexual relationships.
This review of Brokeback Mountain (2005) was written by Mark J on 22 Jul 2016.
Brokeback Mountain has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
