Review of Brighton Rock (2010) by Lucy W — 31 Dec 2012
After seeing the original film, which I loved, I decided to take a look at this new redo of Greene's novel. Although it's not as good as the 1947 film, it has some interesting "personal touches" that prevent this remake from being just a copy of the original film.
First, Rose's character: here, her background and her story are much more highlighted, and I, who wished to see more of her (and her relationship with Pinkie) on the 1947 version, was satisfied to see her character more often.
I liked watching Riseborough as the new Rose; she captured her innocence quite well. Riley's Pinkie is overshadowed by Attenborough's previous performance. His Pinkie was more feral and out-of-control than Attenborogh's cold and quiet psychopath.
The film begins with Kite's (a fatherly figure for Pinkie) death, and so it almost justifies the young man's madness (which wasn't very necessary). The photography and the music are beautiful, though.
A good remake, but not an excellent one. Can be confusing for those who haven't read the book or watched the previous film. My advice: if you were thrilled enough with the novel and the 1947 version, give this one a chance, but don't expect too much of it.
This review of Brighton Rock (2010) was written by Lucy W on 31 Dec 2012.
Brighton Rock has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
