Review of Be Cool (2005) by Karl E — 11 Jun 2013
Not a good sequel.
The 3rd star is for The Rock. :-).
This review of Be Cool (2005) was written by Karl E on 11 Jun 2013.
Be Cool has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
Not a good sequel.
The 3rd star is for The Rock. :-).
This review of Be Cool (2005) was written by Karl E on 11 Jun 2013.
Be Cool has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
By Pete Vonder Haar (745) for Film Threat (5,156) on 18 Jul 2015
Review of Be Cool (2005)
By Jack Mathews (1,044) for New York Daily News (5,623) on 29 Aug 2017
Review of Be Cool (2005)
By Shawn Levy (1,238) for Portland Oregonian (2,019) on 18 Nov 2012
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
By Scott Tobias (1,684) for The A.V. Club (5,644) on 14 Jul 2017
Review of Payback (1999)
Review of The Whole Nine Yards (2000)
By Marjorie Baumgarten (1,950) for Austin Chronicle (7,653) on 01 Dec 2015
Review of Nick of Time (1995)
By Ken Hanke (2,234) for Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC) (2,247) on 20 Nov 2003
Review of The Getaway (1994)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 16 Jul 2010
Review of The Whole Ten Yards (2004)
By Betty Jo Tucker (725) for ReelTalk Movie Reviews (1,771) on 10 Apr 2004
Popular Movies Right Now
