It's kind of -- hmmmm, less than good, a little better than not bad, almost all right, mediocre without being grating, sort of in the C-minus-to-C-minus-minus range.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Be Cool (2005) was written by Stephen Hunter and published by Washington Post on 16 Apr 2008.
Be Cool has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 11 Nov 2013
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
Review of Be Cool (2005)
By Carlos I (1,309) on 07 Jan 2017
Review of Bean (1997)
By Philip Martin (1,107) for Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (1,391) on 08 Dec 2002
Review of Because I Said So (2007)
By Rick Kisonak (485) for Film Threat (5,156) on 17 Feb 2007
Review of The Next Best Thing (2000)
Review of Crank (2006)
Review of Training Day (2001)
By Harsh C (266) on 10 Feb 2012
Review of Murder, My Sweet (1944)
Review of Get Carter (1971)
By Deadly V (456) on 04 Jan 2012
Popular Movies Right Now
