Review of Atlas Shrugged: Part I (2011) by Jgraham41 — 20 Apr 2011
Apparently the objectivist ideal for aesthetics is "painting the world as the artist envisions it is or should be...." and nothing at all else. So how well people are portrayed is irrelevant.
There are *so* many 10's here. Really objectivists? That's your objective evaluation of the film? It is perfect in every aspect? Those reviews make about as much sense as the "10" ratings for Avatar which start with "Well the story is bad but.
..". So the movie is full of trite and unrealistic characters (which is kind of the fault of the subject matter) and the portrayals are awful and wooden. It's not very sexy but I expect that some of the sex scenes from the novel might even be seen as misogynist.
Very little actually happens in the film and even ideologically I found myself yawning rather than seething at the bad guys. Which is better than Avatar where I found myself wanting the earth forces to win.
This review of Atlas Shrugged: Part I (2011) was written by Jgraham41 on 20 Apr 2011.
Atlas Shrugged: Part I has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
