Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 19 Jul 2026 at 01:39 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Joanna B — 01 Mar 2016

Share
Tweet

Who could it be?

Twas it he, or twas it not he; that is the question. Shrouded in controversy the true nature and identity of William Shakespeare has been contested ever since the creation of his unparalleled library began enthralling audiences in the early 1600's.

Although her majesty Queen Elizabeth is well known to have embraced the arts; Shakespeare, like all actors and playwrights of the time, were viewed as scoundrels and petty criminals, who praised false idols through expressive creation.

Thank fully this is a view the world no longer clings too. Most especially in the case of The Bard. Undisputedly one of the most influential writers in history; prolifically adding 20,000 words to the English cannon, devising 37 plays of which set the foundations to most comedies, tragedies and histories, and blessing love with over 150 sonnets from the heart.

But above all he was intriguing. At the time of his death, the real William Shakespeare, the actor, was a known almost illiterate who delivered a number of his plays under an anonymous title and bizarrely had 5 different spellings of his own name. Curiously, who was he really?

Anonymous.

Offering just one hypothetical perspective to the inconsistencies of the time, this story is not about William the actor from Stratford-upon-Avon, but the royal man-behind-the -quill who drove the politically motivated writing of which he claimed, and the queen of which he wished to reach.

As the curtain opens in a modern NYC theatre and we are immediately transported through prose back into Elizabethan England.

17th Earl of Oxford, Edward De Vere (Rhys Ifans) is a stately aristocrat and must follow the etiquette his position commands. Considered, by the day, to be the devils work, composing plays or 'sinful tales' is not an appropriate hobby for his station.

Bound and unable to present his expansive works openly, Edward calls for emerging playwright Ben Johnson (Sebastian Armesto), offering him a tidy commission to accept and introduce the pieces under his own name.

Reluctant, Johnson takes one, asking his acting acquaintance William Shakespeare (Rafe Spall) to perform it under an anonymous title. As Edward watches with anticipation from the stalls; the crowd's reaction to the powerful prose is intoxicating. Calling for the playwrights' identity, before Johnson can accept, the uncouth Shakespeare takes to the stage seizing the opportunity of unearned accolades.

Meanwhile, the Royal court is a flutter over who may be the aging and childless Queen Elizabeth's (Vanessa Redgrave) successor. Complicated by secret affairs and illegitimate children, the Virgin queen is not so virtuous and her suppressed passion for the theatre indulges passionate memories of love long past.

Conducting the orchestra in the centre of the political power play is Royal adviser William Cecit (David Thewlis) and later succeeded by his hunch-back son Robert (Edward Hogg), but they are no match for Edwards politically bias and commoner pleasing plays leading to uproar in both the lands and the court.

Filled with historical conspiracies, political skulduggery and sexual transgressions, this films compelling and delicious appeal is its web of fact-based elements. Power, betrayal, incest, facades and the theatre, The Bard himself would not lament at screenwriter John Orloff's words or designers Sebastian Krawinkel's exquisite envisioning.

74 year old Redgrave delivers extraordinary complexity and vulnerability to the ageing Queen of England and her daughter Joely Richardson invests playfulness and innocence into the flash-backed younger portions of the role. Hogg is sensational as the Machiavellian Cecil. Ifans is measured and accomplished whist the two Earls, Southampton (Australia's own rising star Xavier Samuel) and Essex (Sam Reid) are credible and destined to elude the indiscretions of their Twilight appearances.

The verdict: Though-provoking. Compelling. Astute. Fanciful. Looking beyond the disproving bias and the authorship debate, my mother's response at the close of this film captured its true essence of topic and tone "You simply feel like you just want to clap, I want to do some research and come see it again".

For never was there a story of more wow, than this of Elizabeth and her Romeo.

Published: The Queanbeyan Age.

Date of Publication: 11/11/2011.

This review of Anonymous (2011) was written by on 01 Mar 2016.

Anonymous has generally received mixed reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of Anonymous

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

Review of

By for (752) on 07 Dec 2006

Read Review

Review of

By on 15 Mar 2011

So it's a satire…

Read Review

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS