Review of Anatomy of a Murder (1959) by Cecilia C — 13 Mar 2009

Director Otto Preminger really proved he was a filmmaker with clout by being able to make a film like this. Even in 1959, when Hollywood was actually THINKING first and making money second, this film was a risk.

First, its dialogue gets pretty graphic (for the day). Secondly, much of the second half of the film is set ONLY in the courtroom, leaving the audience nothing to do than watch lawyers bickering and objecting.

Preminger must have known what he was doing when he made this black and white, two-and-a-half-hour courtroom drama?because I dare you to take your eyes off this one for even a second. Yes, I said two-and-a-half-hours?much of it set in court with more dialogue than action.

But, somehow, it works. It is a truly captivating film. James Stewart plays a quirky small-town lawyer who takes the case of an Army lieutenant who gets arrested for killing a man who allegedly raped his wife.

We find this out right in the beginning and then the rest of the film is how Stewart goes about setting up his case and what steps he takes before and during trial. Sounds dull, right? Well, as I said, Preminger must have had magic up his sleeve for this one because this film is never is dull.

It clips along through witness testimony and presented evidence, and all that legal fun stuff. And trust me, there is plenty of tension?I mean all along we?re wondering if Stewart is going to be able to achieve what he set out to achieve?getting Lt.

Manion off for the murder?a murder Lt. Manion has NEVER denied he committed. But, it?s more than just a movie about suspense?it?s a movie about the process of the law?about how our justice system works and about how lawyers plug along and make their case.

A fascinating film about a subject that could have been un-fascinating, if put in the wrong hands. Thankfully, Preminger?s hands were the right ones.