Review of Alone in the Dark (2005) by Coolgames101 — 12 Sep 2011
This movie is crap. grade a crapage. what I mean by this is that I, unlike the other people that said that this was good, played the original game for the computer, and played the re-make for the xbox 360.
(very good console) and found myself transported to a dark and sureal story line with horror, suspence, mystery, and even religous lingo thrown in, and the survival aspect was best ever. this movie on the other hand had little to no suspence, the answer to the mystery was obvious, and the acting.
....... Is undescribably bad. there is no redeeming qualities in it. the story was nothing like the game, the remake was about the devil rising, and all of it was set in central park new york. the old game was set in a mansion.
this one was set in a city. no central park, just a city. Is there anything that I can say that describes how stupid and assonine that is? The answer is no, I can not. And that's just the start of the crap, including the fact that it has the biggest loop hole in the world.
So big that the grand canyon is a little crack in the pavement compared to it. At the end of the movie, there is a city that all the residents have been aparently eaten by the monsters. And there are no bodies, or blood.
Oh my god. How does that work. If godzilla raged through that city, it would be destroyed. And there might be survivors, but there is no one there, and everything is intact. Great clean up job, guys. I am impressed.
It would be like having a house of the dead movie with barely having the house of the dead. Wait, that exists. Okay... It would be like having a resident evil movie with no Chris Redfield, or Jill or wesker.
This review of Alone in the Dark (2005) was written by Coolgames101 on 12 Sep 2011.
Alone in the Dark has generally received very negative reviews.
Was this review helpful?
