Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 24 Jul 2026 at 13:59 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Matthew S — 18 Jul 2015

Share
Tweet

Kubrick's translation of Anthony Burgess's novella has the rare distinction of actually being better than the source material.

The meaning and intention of this iconic film can be viewed from several different perspectives. But my interpretation of the film's over-riding concern is an examination of psychiatry's idea of "Behaviourism" applied to "cure" sociopathically-cruel individuals. The protagonist is presented as a particularly horrible human being who after committing truly evil crimes ends up being a test subject for the use of aversion therapy to render his vile desires harmless.

The film's over-sexualized set designs and the sinisterly dystopian reality of these roaming pack of thugs lends the audience clues about the nature of the cruelty. But Kubrick also interlaces this extreme "pop art" world with a carefully studied approach that also hints that our own "pleasures" and "curiosities" about aspects of this reality pulls the audience into a very unsettling position.

Like the novella, the film not only forces the question regarding whether or not a criminally-insane person can be "saved" but also forces an examination of morals and ethics.

The film created a great deal of controversy when it was initially released. It remains controversial today. The film's violence including a home invasion featuring mayhem, torture and rape are all presented with a strange sort of maniacally glee. In some ways it feels as if Kubrick was pushing well past "satire" toward something altogether different. A true genius, Kubrick turns the table on the audience throughout the movie.

It is important to note that this is not a film for children. The mix of dark humor, aesthetics and human cruelty are filmed with the intention to "thrill" as much as "repel." It is an uneasy proposition that could easily be misunderstood by younger audiences.

Malcolm McDowell has built a career from his realistic intensity. But even if this had been the only film he ever made -- his work here would be enough to forever earn him the distinction of an amazing actor. As for Kubrick's film -- I consider it flawless and a true cinematic masterpiece. If you are an adult and have not seen it -- you must.

This review of A Clockwork Orange (1971) was written by on 18 Jul 2015.

A Clockwork Orange has generally received very positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of A Clockwork Orange

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS