Review of 10,000 BC (2008) by Michael M — 28 Jul 2013
As is typical, the critics have to trash something to make themselves feel important. The movie does have a plot and a fairly tight one. One of the primary critiques is that the film is "archeologically inaccurate".
Mmmm, when has historical accuracy been the vasis of a good film. Also, it is somewhat historically accurate. It's good action, a compelling plot and some excellent visuals. You could do worse. Worth a watch.
This review of 10,000 BC (2008) was written by Michael M on 28 Jul 2013.
10,000 BC has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
